당신은 의견을 가질 권리가 없습니다. 다만 제대로 된 의견을 가질 권리만 있을 뿐이죠. 그 누구도 무식할 권리는 없기 때문입니다.
HARLAN ELLISON
INTJ
용의주도한 설계자라고도 불리우는 이 유형은
조직에서 합리적으로 문제에 대한 다양한 솔루션을 제공하는
조용한 개인으로 정의되는 성격 유형이다.
(이렇게 보면 뭔말인가 싶기도 하다)
INTJ-A와 INTJ-T두 성격 유형 모두 유사점이 많아 비슷하다고 생각하지만,
이들에게 기능적인 역할에 있어서 나타나는 표현의 차이가 발생한다.
INTJ 유형의 대표적인 이미지로는
매우 지적인 사람이라는 말을 많이 들을 수 있다
생각이 많고 지적으로도 우수한 성격이며
전체 인구에서 차지하는 비율도 그렇게 많지 않은 편이다
또한 여기에 더하여 이들은 대중적으로 활발한 성격이 아니기에
남들과 다른 삶을 살아갈 확률이 높다
INTJ: 내가 미친게 아니라 너가 평범한거야
INTJ유형의 천재성을 엿볼수 있는 짤
INTJ-T
INTJ-T 유형은 상대적으로 자신의 일에 더 열심히
노력을 하는데 이러한 특성은
A 유형에 비해 상대적으로 낮은 자신감으로 인해 자신에게서
결점을 발견하기 때문이다
이에 따라 전보다 더 잘하려고 노력하며
더 치밀하게 열심히 노력한다
이렇게 열심히 하는 이유는
진심으로 걱정을 많이 하기 때문이다
더 개선되고 싶고 더 발전하는 사람이 되고자하는
욕구로 인해 이렇게 일들을 열심히 처리하는 것이다
이들은 문제해결 능력에 있어 훌륭한 면모를 보인다
INTJ 유형의 특성상 어떠한 조직 또는 상황에서
문제점이나 결점의 원인을 아주 빨리 찾아내는 능력이 있다
이것은 위에 언급했던 걱정을 많이 하는것과 연관이 되어있는데
애초부터 성격자체가 걱정이 많기에
신경을 많이 써서 주의하고 경계하는 성격이다
따라서 바로 문제와 원인을 파악하는 문제 발견과
해결능력에 높은 역량을 보이는 것이다
(남들보다 먼저 문제를 찾고 먼저 해결책을 제시)
INTJ: 당신이 싫어할법한 것들을 찝어낸다
그러나 INTJ유형은 항상 자신이 먼저 발견한 문제에 대한
해결책을 내놓지는 않는다
위에 말한 걱정이 많은 특성에 따라
타인에게 문제점을 말함에 있어 꺼려질 때가 많고
사람들에게 좋은 피드백을 받지 못했던 경험을
지속적으로 하게 되면
‘혹시 이번에도 내가 틀렸으면..’
이라는 생각을 하게 되고 이러한 생각들은
INTJ유형이 가지고 있는 먼저 문제를 인식하고
해결책을 내놓는 장점을 가리며
사람들에게 말하는걸 꺼리게 된다고 한다
(INTJ 유형의 본질을 알아주는 사람들이 주변에 있는 것이 중요하게 작용한다)
INTJ-T 유형은 상황이 바뀌면 자신이 세운 계획을
보다 쉽게 바꿀 수 있는 사람들이다.
안정적인 성격인 INTJ이지만 자신이 수정을 해야한다고 생각한다면
이미 세워져 있던 계획도 수정하는 모습을 보인다
이에 따라 INTJ-A 유형에 비해 상대적으로 유연하고
융통성이 있는 모습을 보인다
INTJ-T 유형에게는 더 나은 상태로 발전시키고 싶은 욕구가 있기 때문에
현재의 계획을 바꾸면 더 나은 결고를 가져온다는 생각이
굳혀졌을 때 계획을 바꾸게 된다
감정표현을 불편해하는 INTJ유형이지만
그들중 INTJ-T 유형은 상대적으로 자신의 감정에 잘 반응하고
본인의 감정을 잘 활용하는 편이다
그렇기에 화가 더 잘 나고 무서움 또한 잘 느끼는 특성을 가지고 있다
이들은 불확실성에 대한 두려움이 있다고 한다
감정을 활용하는 측면에 있어 A유형보다 더 잘 활용하기 때문에
사람들과 대화하고 소통하는 장에서 더 유리한 모습을 보인다
이들은 타인에게 개방적으로 보이고
상대적으로 다가가기 쉽기에 사람들의 피드백을 많이 받을 수 있다
또한 이들은 타인의 피드백을 필요로 하기도 한다
이들의 특성상 A 유형에 비해
타인에게 도움을 요청하는 것을 어려워 할 수 있지만
타인의 조언에 있어 이를 중요하게 여긴다는 증거이기도 하다
(INTJ-T 유형의 60%정도가 타인으로 인해 기분이 상하기도 한다고 대답하였다)
INTJ-A
INTJ-A 유형의 93%는 자신이 인생을 살아감에 있어 겪는
문제들에 대해 자신이 해결할 수 있다고 대답했다
이러한 것들로 보아 INTP-A 유형은 자신의 생각과 자신에 대한
확신으로 가득차 있다고 볼 수 있다
따라서 인생을 살면서 오는 스트레스에 대해
스스로 잘 관리 할 수 있다고 생각하며
설령 일이 잘못되었다 할지라도
후회를 잘 하지 않는 성격이기 때문에
과거의 실패 경험으로 인해 자극을 받거나
동기부여가 일은 잘 없다고 한다
INTJ유형 특성상 이들은 뜻을 가지고 살아간다
이들의 동기부여를 타인이 아니라 자기 자신에게서 찾는데
자신의 논리와 자기 스스로의 확신에 때문에
열심히하는 원천이 만들어지기 때문에
(자신의 논리, 지식)
타인의 의견에도 흔들림없이 본인의 일에 집중하고
일을 처리하는 능력이 있다
INTJ: 희망과 감정을 이겨내고 논리와 근거로만 사고 하도록 만들어진 생명체...
INTJ-A 유형은 인생에 갑작스런 문제가 생겼을 때
해당문제에 잘 대처할 수 있는 능력을 가지고 있다
어떠한 일에 대한 의사결정을 내려야 하는 상황이나
문제에 대한 해결전략을 짜야하는 상황에서 INTJ-A유형의
능력이 두드러지게 나타난다
이들은 슬픔과 목락에 관한 일들에서도
긍정적인 측면이 있다고 생각할 수 있는 능력을 가진 사람들이며
따라서 INTJ-A 유형에게 어떠한 문제든
해결할 수 있다는 생각이 있다
이것은 어떠한 상황에 직면했을 때에도 두려워하지 않고
문제를 해결하게 만든다
(주위사람에게 신임을 많이 얻는다)
INTJ-A유형은 T유형에 비해 상대적으로 융통이 없는 유형이다
앞을 내다볼수 있는 선구안적인 시선은 정말
훌륭하게 평가되지만
주변의 작은 일들에 많이 신경을 쓰지 않는다
그것들을 현재 있는 상태로 내버려둬도 괜찮다는 생각을 가지고 있다
작은일을 중요하게 생각하지 않고
큰 일들만 신경 쓰는 경향이 있다
INTJ-A 유형은 T유형에 비해 상대적으로
독립적인 성향을 가진 유형이다
이들은 자신과 많은 직급의 차이가 나는 사람과
같은 자리에 있어도 불편함을 느끼지 않는다고 응답했다
이처럼 주위에 많은 압박을 받지 않는것이다
따라서 타인의 의견에 휘둘리지 않고
독자적으로 빠르게 의사결정을 내릴 수 있는 능력이 있다
이들의 독립적이라는 장점은 사람들과 함께 협업하는
일에 있어 함께 하는 것을 어려워 할수도 있다
Reference
✔️ 자세히 알아보기 URL (More information)
↓https://www.16personalities.com/articles/assertive-architect-intj-a-vs-turbulent-architect-intj-t
The Architect – a personality type defined as a quiet individual who values organization, rationality, and imaginative solutions to problems. But what happens when we add one more characteristic to the mix: Identity? Both Assertive Architects (INTJ-A) and Turbulent Architects (INTJ-T) maintain their similarities and value the same things, but with a twist that adds important, functional nuance to their expression of Architect qualities.
This Identity difference probably influences every part of their lives in some way. For our purposes (and for brevity’s sake), we’ll explore a few of the more apparent areas where our research shows a gap between the two types of Architects.
Are you a Turbulent Architect? Check out “Turbulent Architect Superpowers” at the bottom of this article for the deepest insights into who you are.
Expressing Ambition Differently
Assertive Architects are likely to approach the things they do with a greater degree of self-assurance. These Architects feel more confident about handling the stressors that are inevitably a part of life. They are less likely to experience regret if things go wrong. So, stressors and past failures are less likely to be motivators.
However, confidence isn’t everything and may not always guarantee success. For Turbulent Architects, many of their best efforts come from concerns about real or perceived shortcomings. This may push them to work harder and be more meticulous in an attempt to do better or make things better. These personalities are more thorough – not despite the fact that they worry, but because they do worry. Turbulent Architects are likely to carry their diligent desire for improvement into any of their personal or professional endeavors.
93% of Assertive Architects trust themselves to overcome any challenges life can throw their way, compared to 71% of Turbulent Architects.
All Architect personalities feel fairly confident when facing challenges and regard rational problem-solving highly. But Turbulent Architects more typically find any imperfections in a system very early in the process. This is due to their more worrisome nature, which creates a kind of hypervigilance. Their analytical nature then helps them find useful solutions, sometimes even before others realize such a solution is needed. This foresight can create a solid reputation that elevates them at work and at home.
However, this doesn’t mean that Turbulent Architects always follow through on the solutions they develop. The same apprehension that allows these personalities to find problems early in the process might also prevent them from mentioning such flaws to others. “How can this go wrong?” might be replaced by, “What if I’m wrong?” This new question may stifle any impulse to share insights and solutions.
49% of Turbulent Architects are often afraid of making decisions, compared to 18% of Assertive Architects.
Both types of Architects lean toward being ambitious. But there’s a potential trap in thinking that Assertive Architects are less ambitious than their Turbulent counterparts because they come across as less intense. Their confidence may make them look like they are effortlessly and casually cruising along with few signs of visible stress. Some may interpret this relaxed demeanor as apathy.
Assertive Architects can care as much as Turbulent Architects – it’s just that their motivation comes from somewhere different. It comes more from within rather than from without and from a place of certainty rather than uncertainty. This allows for a steadier gait that’s less influenced by any fluctuations around them. Their confidence places a lot of faith in their logic and understanding, and that conviction glides Assertive Architect personalities toward their accomplishments.
Dealing with Change and the Unexpected
The slightly more adventurous Assertive Architects are likely to feel better equipped to handle whatever life throws at them – especially with strategies and decision-making. They are more likely than Turbulent Architects to report that they believe bad luck has a positive side. To these personalities, things are rarely so dire that they can’t handle them. While they prefer stability, they’re not likely to fear instability.
However, Assertive Architect personalities can be a little more rigid than their Turbulent counterparts with intentional change. While they can be forward-thinking and visionary, they may see more mundane things as being fine just as they are, with no need to alter anything on a practical level. They may not have the impetus of improvement behind their regard for change and may not feel as much of a need to apply smaller tweaks to a system.
But this is not so for Turbulent Architects. Though influenced by their stability-oriented Judging personality trait, they’re somewhat more likely than Assertive Architects to say they often change both their long- and short-term goals.
32% of Turbulent Architects say they often change their long-term goals, compared to 17% of Assertive Architects.
While neither Architect is typically big on changing their goals, a relative willingness to change is a true Turbulent difference. Turbulent personality types, with an eye always aimed at improvement, commonly deal with the moving targets and shifting methods that are often necessary to change something for the better. As much as Turbulent Architects value stability and consistency, they will shake things up – but only if doing so clearly paves the way to better results.
Responding to the People in Their Lives: The Same but Different
While both are sometimes uncomfortable expressing feelings, Turbulent Architects are relatively more likely to let their emotions play a role. These personalities consistently report, for example, that they are more easily provoked and more likely to feel fear – especially fear of uncertainty. More Turbulent Architects say they are emotionally expressive in general when compared to their Assertive counterparts.
81% of Assertive Architects say they are rarely or very rarely offended by someone, compared to 41% of Turbulent Architects.
Humans are emotional creatures. Turbulent Architects’ different levels of expressiveness and relative need for people may give them an advantage over Assertive Architects for connecting with others. Turbulent Architects may get more buy-in for their ideas from others because of their more approachable, open attitude. They are also more likely to feel the need to ask for advice – but then find it more difficult than Assertive personalities to make the request. Nonetheless, it shows that they value what others have to offer.
Assertive Architects are likely to take a somewhat more independent approach. A larger percentage of Assertive Architects report that they’re comfortable around authority figures than their Turbulent counterparts. These Assertive personality types may not be as held back by concern over how others might judge them – potentially creating a more independent attitude.
72% of Turbulent Architects feel pressured to live up to a certain standard (e.g., home, car, salary), compared to 45% of Assertive Architects.
There are certain advantages to this difference. More independent actors, like the Assertive Architects, may have greater autonomy and enjoy a more streamlined decision-making process. Depending on the task, a single person can often be agile in a way that a group cannot. But independence can also make them appear unwilling to listen to others or take their needs and wants seriously. This can make collaboration and teamwork difficult.
In Summary
- Turbulent Architects are often fueled by their worries and concerns, and these can be used to make significant progress. They can often see problems (and sometimes find solutions) long before others.
- Stress affects Assertive Architects less, but this should not be confused with their not caring.
- Both types of Architects are often ambitious – but their motivations are different.
- Assertive Architects are motivated more from within, and their inspiration to act is based on confidence in their rationality.
- Turbulent Architects are moved forward in life to a greater degree by their concerns, worries, and how others might see them.
- While neither personality type is likely to be very comfortable with their emotions, Turbulent Architects are more likely to express theirs and use them to connect with others by being more approachable.
- Assertive Architects are less likely to be as concerned about the opinions of others. They relish their independence and make decisions on their own.
- Both personality types need order and predictability, but Assertive Architects are slightly more adventurous than Turbulent Architects. They prefer stability but don’t necessarily fear instability.
- However, Turbulent Architects are often more willing to change intentionally than their Assertive cousins.
Shared Foundations
When we focus on the Identity personality traits, it’s important to remember that one is not better or more legitimate than the other. A Turbulent Architect is no less of an Architect than an Assertive Architect, and vice versa. It’s like spice in a stew. All the main ingredients are there – but add some savory spices to increase its sweetness, sourness, or heat, and the stew is suddenly something a bit different.
The world needs confident Architects to boldly present their many ideas and insights. It also needs cautious Architects to anticipate problems and to care about and respond to opinions. Their unique differences, no matter how subtle or pronounced, can contribute to the world – each in their own ways.
